Journal article
Proc. ACM Hum. Comput. Interact., 2024
APA
Click to copy
Seberger, J. S., Choung, H., Snyder, J., & David, P. (2024). Better Living Through Creepy Technology? Exploring Tensions Between a Novel Class of Well-Being Apps and Affective Discomfort in App Culture. Proc. ACM Hum. Comput. Interact.
Chicago/Turabian
Click to copy
Seberger, John S., Hyesun Choung, Jaime Snyder, and Prabu David. “Better Living Through Creepy Technology? Exploring Tensions Between a Novel Class of Well-Being Apps and Affective Discomfort in App Culture.” Proc. ACM Hum. Comput. Interact. (2024).
MLA
Click to copy
Seberger, John S., et al. “Better Living Through Creepy Technology? Exploring Tensions Between a Novel Class of Well-Being Apps and Affective Discomfort in App Culture.” Proc. ACM Hum. Comput. Interact., 2024.
BibTeX Click to copy
@article{john2024a,
title = {Better Living Through Creepy Technology? Exploring Tensions Between a Novel Class of Well-Being Apps and Affective Discomfort in App Culture},
year = {2024},
journal = {Proc. ACM Hum. Comput. Interact.},
author = {Seberger, John S. and Choung, Hyesun and Snyder, Jaime and David, Prabu}
}
Well-being apps promise to improve people's lives. Yet evidence shows that the data-hungry app culture that contextualizes well-being apps normalizes the user experience of affective discomfort. This apparent contradiction raises a difficult question: Is it responsible to ask people to improve their well-being by engaging further with an app culture that normalizes affective discomfort? We approached this question by deploying an online, scenario-based survey (n=688) about a fictional, but realistic well-being app called "Thalia." Thalia represents a novel class of well-being apps that are envisioned to: (i) utilize AI-driven facial recognition and analysis; and (ii) collect data for use in medical contexts. We found that people perceived Thalia to be affectively discomfiting even as they judged Thalia to be beneficial. Such findings imply a trade-off between 'better living through technology' and the negative affective implications of surveillance capitalistic app culture. Such a trade-off necessitates high-level analysis of just what "well-being" means in the context of contemporary app culture. Through analysis and discussion, we explore a troubling interplay between novel well-being apps and affective discomfort that requires careful attention from HCI researchers if human-centered well-being -- flourishing -- is truly what our products are intended to foster.